Compare Enkasa Homes and Nobul
For Sellers
For Buyers
For Buyers
Answer: Enkasa Homes is a buyer's real estate agent that offers savings to homebuyers while Nobul is a referral fee network that enables broker-to-broker collusion with use of blanket referral agreements
Buying with Enkasa
Enkasa is a tech-enabled real estate broker and a residential remodeling construction management company. Enkasa’s services are paid through a Buyer Agent Commission (BAC) concession, typically offered by the seller’s agent to the buyer’s agent when a property is advertised on the MLS.
If a home buyer is already working with another agent, Enkasa’s Construction Managers can conduct a property consultation, review disclosures, and assess feasibility of your ideas for repairs or improvements.
Enkasa Pricing
Enkasa brokerage revenue comes from Buyer Agent Commissions (BAC) amounts offered by the sellers' agents. Enkasa’s Contractor Consultation costs between $299 and $1,299. For comparison, a Buyer Agent Commission (BAC) offered at 3% for a $4 million home (not uncommon in California) is about $120,000 without a negotiated buyer rebate. Enkasa rebates consultation service fees to any client who uses Enkasa to represent them as their agent in purchasing a home.
Listing Services
- MLS Listing
- Zillow, Trulia, etc. Listing
- Accept and Deliver All Offers and Counteroffers
- Hold Open Houses
- Professional Photography
- Professional Floor Plans
- Yard Signage Installation
- Spare Key Lock-box Installation
- Schedule Inspection Services
- Schedule Private Showings
- Closing Duties
Buyer's Agent Services
- Find the Property
- Accept and Deliver All Offers and Counteroffers
- Recommend Other Professionals
- Attend Inspection Services
- Schedule Private Showings
- Negotiate Needed Repairs
- Closing Duties
Enkasa Homes Editor's Review:
Enkasa is a California brokerage that operates under a DRE license #02155340. Enkasa claims that: "Buyers don’t pay Enkasa anything. We charge sellers industry-standard brokerage commissions." First of all, buyer agents never work for free. Second of all, there are no industry-standard brokerage commissions in real estate. All commissions are eventually paid by the buyer when s/he writes a check (or takes out the new mortgage) on a newly-purchased property. Sellers lose equity due to costs of listing commissions, but buyers pay all closing costs including the costs of buy-side commissions built into the final accepted offer on a home.
Buyers in reality pay for Enkasa’s services through a Buyer Agent Commission (BAC) concession, typically offered by the seller’s agent to the buyer’s agent when a property is advertised on the MLS. In California, where Enkasa is licensed, a buyer can negotiate a rebate from this "blanket" BAC amount to reduce the cost of commissions financially. This rebate is a tax-free, fully negotiable amount is that converts an "industry-standard" BAC commission into a competitive rate.
Enkasa further claims that "because we help you buy sooner, we’re more efficient than other brokers, so we don’t charge you any extra fees for helping you plan your home improvements." Sooner than what? This is an empty statement with an unfounded claim that choosing Enkasa somehow will allow a buyer to purchase a home faster. The costs associated with "helping buyers plan for home improvements" are simply bundled by Enkasa into the Buyer Agent Commission revenue it will receive at the closing.
In the real world, the home buyer can openly negotiate tens of thousands in tax-free rebates with highly competitive agents and often use that money to not just "help plan home improvements," but to renovate a home.
According to their website, Enkasa’s Contractor Consultation costs between $299 and $1,299. For comparison, a Buyer Agent Commission (BAC) offered at 3% for a $4 million home (not uncommon in California) is about $120,000. If a buyer is able to negotiate a buyer refund at 50% of BAC from a competitive and a highly-qualified agent, that refund amount adds up to $60,000 in tax-free cash due to the buyer from their agent after the closing of the transaction.
The United States Department of Justice has made it clear in the 2020 settlement agreement with the NAR that buyer agents do not work for free and to advertise services as such is a deceptive practice. Provided that Enkasa’s services can be unbundled, the best way I can describe the financial incentive offered by Enkasa is a credit of $1,299 for the "consultation service fee waived for any client who uses Enkasa to represent them as their agent in purchasing a home." In another word, if you are a home buyer looking for a $4 home in California with Enkasa as your buyer agent, their brokerage may receive about $120,000 in Buyer Agent Commission as a fee before they credit you $1,299 as a cash incentive, an equivalent of a 1% cash rebate where the 99% of the BAC is kept by the brokerage.
Consumers should further carefully read Enkasa Terms of Service, where, for example:
…You will only be permitted to pursue claims and seek relief against Enkasa on an individual basis, not as a plaintiff or class member in any class or representative action or proceeding; and …
…You are waiving your right to pursue disputes or claims and seek relief in a court of law and to have a jury trial on your claims…
… Enkasa provides services, including the transaction assistance, on an "as is" and "as available" basis. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, Enkasa does not provide any express or implied warranties, conditions, or representations regarding the services, including transaction assistance, or any information provided in connection with the services and Enkasa, its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, employees, contractors, agents, partners, suppliers, and licensors (collectively, the "Enkasa parties") disclaim any and all warranties, representations, and conditions of any kind, whether express, implied, or statutory, including all warranties or conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title, quiet enjoyment, accuracy, or non-infringement. Enkasa makes no guarantee that the services will function without interruption or errors…
…You acknowledge and agree that the Enkasa parties are not liable, and you will not seek to hold the Enkasa parties liable, for the conduct of third parties, including operators of external sites, and that the risk of injury from such third parties rests entirely with you. Enkasa makes no warranty that the goods or services provided by third parties will meet your requirements or be available on an uninterrupted, secure, or error-free basis. Enkasa makes no warranty regarding the quality of any such goods or services, or the accuracy, timeliness, truthfulness, completeness or reliability thereof…
In conclusion, the advertised premise where "Enkasa charges industry-standard agent commissions, so buyers and sellers don’t pay anything more than they would with other agents" is plain false. There are highly competitive agents who will compete for buyers’ with buyer agents rebates; there are no industry-standard agent commissions in California. In some states, such as Oregon, buyers cannot receive rebates due to anticompetitive state-specific rebate bans, but Enkasa is not a licensed broker in any of these ten states.
Because of such blatantly false advertising methods for services offered by Enkasa brokerage, this editor cannot possibly recommend them to any home buyer. The truth has a habit of revealing itself, and the deceptive advertising notions employed by Enkasa, as described in this review, should be enough to raise a common sense alarm for a savvy consumer.
The real estate industry likes to operate on false notions that "buyer agents work for free" and that "commissions are standard" because real estate brokers do not like to compete with each other on pricing. Yet the commission buyer rebate is the single largest line item for savings when buying a home. When shopping for a buyer agent, or a contractor, there are no gimmicks and there are no substitutes for open negotiations and multiple bids with clearly defined pricing schedules. There are no standard rates in the housing industry: everything is negotiable.
As always, we encourage consumers to post unbiased feedback about this business with any sentiment. If hiring this brokerage worked for you, or if it didn’t, other California consumers need to know.
Where does Enkasa Homes operate?
Buying and Selling with Nobul
WARNING: Unlawful Kickbacks, Broker-to-Broker Collusion, False Marketing, Wire Fraud, Price Fixing.
Nobul) is a broker-to-broker collusion scheme, where "partner agents" unlawfully agree to pay massive kickbacks to receive your information and engage in market allocation, consumer allocation, false advertising, unlawful kickbacks, wire fraud, and price-fixing practices in violation of, inter alia, 18 U.S.C. § 1346, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 15 U.S.C. § 45, 12 U.S.C. § 2607, 12 C.F.R. § 1024.14. As a consumer, you will always significantly overpay for Realtor commissions subject to hidden kickbacks and pay-to-play steering promoted in this scheme.
United States federal antitrust laws prohibit consumer allocation and blanket referral agreements between real estate companies.
Be smart; do not allow your information to be "sold as a lead" to a double-dealing Realtor in exchange for massive commission kickbacks paid from your future home sale, or your future home purchase.
Nobul works as a referral fee network that collects pricing and services data from a limited pool of Referred Agents and sends it to consumers as non-binding proposals. Nobul operates as a licensed real estate brokerage in Canada, but it does not produce any services that are typically offered by real estate agents and does not represent consumers when buying or selling real estate in any State.
Nobul is also registered as a broker in Florida under license number CQ1056639 so that it is able to collect referral fees in the United States. When consumers submit information to Nobul, this information is simply sold to real estate agents who are willing to pay for it with a share of their commission. If an Agent does not want to pay a referral fee, the consumer will not see any proposals from them using the Nobul platform.
Nobul claims to provide savings, but consumers are likely to overpay for their Referred Agent's commission due to added mandatory platform fee.
Nobul Pricing
Nobul revenue comes from referral fees and sale of user data.
Listing Services
- This Service Does Not Represent Sellers
Buyer's Agent Services
- This Service Does Not Represent Buyers
Nobul Editor's Review:
Nobul is a referral fee network in business to collect fees for matching brokers with consumers. Referral fees are highly disadvantageous for real estate consumers because they must be accounted for with excessive real estate commissions. Nobul Service Terms state that: “In consideration of Nobul's Referrals pursuant to this Agreement, the Agent shall pay to Nobul, a referral fee (a “Referral Fee”) based on a percentage of revenue equal to 0.2% of the purchase price of the property purchased or sold. The Agent shall pay the Referral Fee to Nobul within ten (10) days following the closing date of the purchase or sale of the property.”
One of the major expenses for real estate consumers, when buying or selling a home, is real estate service fees and closing costs associated with the purchase, or sale. Service fees and closing costs are, for the most part, a necessary expense. Real estate agents significantly help home buyers and sellers to navigate a complicated and competitive real estate process in exchange for a legitimate commission as a reward.
Other closing fees usually include required services such as property appraisals, inspections, title insurance, etc. – all in some way help to legitimize the sale and to manage risk. There can be much said with regards to managing closing costs by choosing a motivated competitive agent who is willing to offer a buyer’s refund or a competitive listing rate.
On the other hand, while claiming it saves money to consumers, Nobul simply adds referral fees into already a fee-ridden process – consumers experience false and fabricated savings in this model. In economics, this process is known as reverse competition, where consumers end up being "sold as leads" to Referred Agents.
The platform works with a limited pool of Referral Agents willing to pay a significant part of their commission to Nobul. This referral fee is back-loaded into Referred Agent's agreement, instead of being handed to the consumer directly. The consumer technically does not pay Nobul, but she ends up with a higher cost of commissions when working with their Referred Agent. Nobul is not a free platform, these fees are simply hidden inside the commission.
Let's say a real estate consumer, James, wants to hire a listing agent when selling a median-priced home for $250,000. A local competitive agent, Jill, offers James a 1.5% commission while helping him in this process. The estimated commission, in this case, is $3,750.
On the other hand, James also receives non-binding proposals using Nobul platform from Referred Agents with a referral fee attached to the back of every proposal. When James is faced with these types of proposals, results are quite different. Firmly assuming that the profit margins and service offerings remain the same for Jill and Referral Agents using Nobul, any possible buyer's refund offered by Referral Agents must be reduced to account for the Nobul referral fees.
The referral fee in this scenario estimated at $500 due to Nobul from a Referral Agent. With the profit margin fixed, the estimated commission Referral Agent may offer to James is now up by $500 set at $4,250. James just effectively paid Nobul $500 for a "service" that is supposed to be "free."
These fees significantly increase with the price of a home and damage quality of service the agent is willing to provide. One reason the amount of savings may ever be matched by Referred Agents versus Jill's competitive savings is due to broker-to-broker pricing collusion - if Referral Agent is willing to reduce their fee beyond market rates to compensate Nobul out of their own pocket, which is highly unlikely and unreasonable to assume. Because referral fees are pre-set between Nobul and Referral Agents in advance, the cost of the referral is easily incorporated with the excessive commission.
The reason we give Nobul a low score is due to exigent fees and the way these fees are structured. Nobul operates a Referral Network that commoditizes consumers as leads. With Nobul agents are forced to quote higher commissions due to added fees. The vast majority of competitive agents refuse to play this game and Nobul simply steers consumers toward a very limited pool of agents in its pay-to-play network.
As a licensed real estate agent that doesn't perform any real estate services, or takes any responsibility for the transaction, it's not entirely clear how this process works under the Business and Professions Code.
Should real estate agents distribute "bids" of other agents for a fee? If one to say that the referral fee is indeed necessary, why not structure it as an actual service fee that is properly charged, instead of having to be back-loaded into Referral Agent's agreement?
The answer is simple – if Nobul was to charge Agents for its service directly, no Agent would ever sign-up. Agents only sign-up with Nobul because the price of the referral fee can be easily incorporated into their client's agreement.
Nobul further violates the privacy of consumers because it requires Referred Agents to disclose major details about the actual home purchase or sale. Nobul states that: "The Agent shall maintain adequate records of all fees and commissions received from the Client and shall make such records available to Nobul at its request. Such records shall include copies of the applicable real estate association’s Listing Agreement, Agreement of Purchase and Sale, a statement of commission earnings and the Trade Record Sheet, as applicable."
Despite collecting the referral fee, Nobul takes absolutely no responsibility for the transaction and consumers to acknowledge and agree "that no employment, joint venture, partnership, or agency relationship exists between you and Nobul as a result of this Agreement or your use of our Services. We are solely independent contractors."
Nobul clearly doesn't provide any tangible value to the real estate consumers as a licensed real estate agent. Nobul further audits all transactions because it needs to find out how much money real estate agents receive in commissions, inevitably collecting private details of consumer’s agreement for home purchase or sale.
This effect is known as a “blind” match. Truly competitive agents who offer great savings to consumers can never use Nobul. For example, a highly competitive flat fee listing service has a set competitive price – they would never be able to pay an excessive fee amount to a third-party.
Nobul referral fee only works is with services who are silent on their commission – if a client comes directly to an agent, one price is given, if a client uses Nobul, another price is in play. We strongly believe that real estate consumers looking to buy or sell a home should always use 0% referral fee platforms in order to avoid paying a higher cost in commissions.
By using Nobul, consumers further encourage pay-to-play bias in a broken real estate industry.